Updating Your Systematic Review

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

  • Recognize the need for updating your systematic review.
  • Identify new evidence and integrate it effectively.
  • Communicate updates clearly to your audience.

Introduction

Updating your systematic review ensures that it remains relevant and reflects the most current evidence. This involves identifying new studies, reassessing previous conclusions, and communicating changes effectively.

This chapter will guide you through the process of updating your systematic review to maintain its accuracy and relevance.

Steps for Updating Your Systematic Review

Assess whether your systematic review requires an update:

  • Time Since Last Update: Consider updating if significant time has passed since the last review.
  • New Evidence: Identify new studies or data that could change the review's conclusions.
  • Change in Guidelines: Update if new clinical guidelines or practices have emerged.

Regularly assess literature and guidelines to determine if an update is necessary.

Search for new studies to include in your review:

  • Update Search Terms: Revise and expand search terms to capture new developments.
  • Database Search: Use multiple databases to ensure comprehensive coverage.
  • Screen New Studies: Apply the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as the original review.

Document your search strategy and any changes made during the update.

Incorporate new findings into your review:

  • Data Extraction: Collect data from new studies using the original extraction methods.
  • Synthesize Findings: Update the data synthesis to include new evidence, whether qualitative or quantitative.
  • Reassess Conclusions: Evaluate if the new evidence changes the overall conclusions of the review.

Ensure consistency in the integration process to maintain the review's integrity.

Effectively communicate the changes to your audience:

  • Revise Report Sections: Update the abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion to reflect new evidence.
  • Highlight Changes: Clearly indicate what has been updated and how it impacts the review's findings.
  • Inform Stakeholders: Notify relevant stakeholders, such as practitioners and policymakers, of the updates.

Transparency in communication builds trust and ensures the review remains a valuable resource.

Best Practices

Maintain Consistency and Quality
  • Consistent Methodology: Use the same methodologies as the original review to ensure comparability.
  • Quality Control: Double-check all updates for accuracy and completeness.
Engage with the Research Community
  • Collaborate with Experts: Seek input from experts to identify significant new evidence.
  • Share Findings: Present updates in academic forums and conferences to disseminate knowledge.
Plan Regular Updates
  • Set Update Intervals: Establish regular intervals for reviewing and updating the systematic review.
  • Monitor Developments: Keep track of advancements in the field to anticipate necessary updates.

Conclusion

Updating your systematic review is essential for maintaining its relevance and accuracy. By following the steps and best practices outlined in this chapter, you can ensure your review remains a valuable resource for decision-makers.

EviSynth provides tools to support the update process, ensuring your review stays current. Explore EviSynth's Features

Tags