Understanding the Purpose and Structure of Systematic Reviews

Learning Objectives

By the end of this tutorial, you will be able to:

  • Define a systematic review and understand its purpose
  • Identify the key components of a systematic review's structure
  • Explain the importance of systematic reviews in evidence-based practice
  • Recognize the challenges and best practices in conducting systematic reviews

Introduction

Systematic reviews are pillars of evidence-based research, offering a comprehensive analysis of existing studies on specific topics. This article delves into the core of systematic reviews, exploring their critical role in research and their meticulous structure. Whether you're a seasoned researcher or just beginning your journey in evidence synthesis, this guide will equip you with the essential knowledge to navigate the world of systematic reviews effectively.

What is a Systematic Review?

A systematic review is a rigorous, methodical approach to:

  1. Gathering all relevant studies on a specific question
  2. Evaluating their quality
  3. Synthesizing their findings

It's essentially a "study of studies" – a comprehensive overview that helps us understand what we know (and don't know) about a particular topic.

The Purpose of Systematic Reviews

Informing Decision-Making

Systematic reviews play a crucial role in evidence-based practice. They help:

  • Clinicians make informed treatment decisions
  • Policymakers craft effective policies
  • Researchers identify gaps in current knowledge

Reducing Bias

Systematic reviews aim to minimize bias that can creep into more traditional literature reviews by following a pre-defined, transparent process.

Synthesizing Large Amounts of Information

Keeping up with all new studies is challenging in today's fast-paced research environment. Systematic reviews consolidate information, making it easier for professionals to stay current.

Structure of a Systematic Review

A well-conducted systematic review typically follows this structure:

1. Formulating the Research Question

  • ​​​​The research question should be clear, focused, and structured using frameworks such as PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) to guide the review process (Nguyen & Singh, 2018).
  • Determining the scope and objectives of the review is crucial, as this will direct all subsequent steps(Khan, 2005).

2. Developing a Protocol

  • A detailed protocol should be established before the review begins, outlining the methods and criteria for study selection, data extraction, and analysis (Pollock & Berge, 2018).
  • This protocol helps ensure consistency and transparency throughout the review process.

3. Searching the Literature

  • Conduct a comprehensive and systematic search across multiple databases to identify all relevant studies, including unpublished data.
  • The search strategy should be replicable and documented in detail to allow for verification and updates (Greyson et al., 2019).

4. Screening and Selecting Studies

  • Select studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure relevance and quality (Bero, 2019).

5. Assessing Study Quality

6. Extracting and Analyzing Data

  • Extract data using predefined variables and coding forms to maintain consistency.
  • Synthesize the findings using quantitative methods like meta-analysis or qualitative approaches when meta-analysis is not feasible (McKenzie et al., 2016) (Cumpston et al., 2020).

7. Interpreting Results

  • Interpret the findings in the context of the existing body of evidence, considering the quality and limitations of the included studies.
  • Use reporting guidelines such as PRISMA to ensure comprehensive and transparent reporting of the review process and findings (Arvanitis, 2024).

Practical Tips for Conducting Systematic Reviews

  • Start with a clear question. Structure your question using the PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome).
  • Be thorough in your search: Don't limit yourself to one database. Consider grey literature too.
  • Document everything: Transparency is key. Keep detailed records of your process.
  • Work with a team: Multiple perspectives can enhance the quality of your review.
  • Stay up-to-date: Consider how you'll handle new studies published during your review process.

Conclusion

Systematic reviews are powerful tools in the world of research. They provide a robust, comprehensive summary of existing evidence on a topic. By understanding their purpose and structure, you're well on your way to conducting your review or better interpreting those you read.

Remember, EviSynth is here to support you throughout this process. Our tools can help streamline many steps of your systematic review, from literature searching to data extraction.

Glossary of Key Terms

PICO Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome
Grey Literature Research produced outside of traditional publishing channels
PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Heterogeneity The variability or differences between studies in a systematic review

Tags