- Identify and differentiate between various types of systematic reviews.
- Understand the unique purposes and applications of each type.
- Learn how to choose the right review type based on your research question.
Systematic reviews are distinct from narrative reviews due to their methodological rigor and explicit criteria for study inclusion. Various types of systematic reviews exist, each tailored to specific research questions and contexts. This chapter explores the different types of systematic reviews, comparing their methodologies and applications.
In this guide, we'll walk you through the different types of systematic reviews. We’ll also explain when each type is most helpful, what they can offer, and how to choose the best one for your research.
While systematic reviews are invaluable for synthesizing evidence, they are not always the best approach for every research question. For instance, when the research field is nascent or highly heterogeneous, scoping reviews may be more appropriate to map the landscape. Additionally, the choice of review type should align with the research objectives, available data, and intended audience, ensuring that the synthesis is both relevant and actionable.
No matter which type of review you choose, the process requires careful planning, rigorous methodology, and a clear understanding of your research goals. With the right approach, a systematic review can help you contribute valuable insights to your field of study.
Eventually, if you choose that a systematic review is what works best for you, EviSynth offers comprehensive databases and collaborative features to guide you every step of the way.
