What makes a good systematic review search strategy?

A robust strategy combines comprehensive database searching (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane), controlled vocabulary like MeSH terms, Boolean operators, and grey literature inclusion to minimize bias.

How does PICO framework improve search results?

The PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model helps structure clinical questions into searchable concepts, ensuring relevant study identification.

What's the difference between Boolean AND vs OR?

AND narrows results (must include both terms), OR broadens coverage (either term), while NOT excludes specific terms. Example: (stress OR anxiety) AND workplace.

Why include grey literature in systematic reviews?

Grey literature (reports, theses, conference proceedings) reduces publication bias and provides unpublished negative results, required by PRISMA guidelines.

How many databases should a systematic review search?

Minimum 3-5 databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and discipline-specific resources like PsycINFO or CINAHL, plus clinical trial registries.

What are MeSH terms and why are they important?

Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) are standardized vocabulary terms in PubMed that improve search accuracy by grouping related concepts.

How to document search strategies properly?

Record: 1) Search dates 2) Database platforms 3) Full search strings 4) Filters applied 5) Number of results. Use PRISMA flow diagrams for reporting.

What's the difference between systematic and narrative reviews?

Systematic reviews use predefined protocols to minimize bias, while narrative reviews offer qualitative summaries without exhaustive search methods.

Developing Effective Search Strategies for Systematic Reviews

Understand the importance of a comprehensive systematic review toolbox.
Identify key elements of an effective systematic review program.
Develop tailored search strategies using advanced systematic review tools.

A strong search strategy is essential for evidence-based research. Utilizing robust systematic review software can streamline the process of gathering all relevant studies, making it easier for others to replicate the search and ensure reliability.

This helps reduce bias and makes findings more reliable. Although Google Scholar is convenient, it has limited control over search settings and lacks transparency. Therefore, using specialized databases and organized search methods is important for better research results.

This tutorial will guide you through the essential steps of creating an effective search strategy. It focuses on balancing sensitivity and specificity to maximize results while maintaining precision. By combining controlled vocabularies, such as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), with flexible search options, researchers can ensure comprehensive and up-to-date retrieval of relevant studies.

Creating a thorough and reproducible search strategy is crucial for conducting high-quality systematic reviews. By understanding key concepts, utilizing controlled vocabularies, and following structured steps, researchers can achieve comprehensive and reliable results. By leveraging a comprehensive systematic review platform, researchers can enhance the transparency and reliability of their systematic reviews, ultimately advancing knowledge and informing decision-making.

Back to Tutorials